<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Oh &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardoh.net/category/philosophy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardoh.net</link>
	<description>Talks about Books, Films and Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Paradigm of Society</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/the-paradigm-of-society-148.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/the-paradigm-of-society-148.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 07:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Paradigm of Society. Richard Oh. Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We use the term society lightly. We say we belong to a society, as if society is an organization that has a clear hierarchy. We say ‘we’ as a body of individuals constitutes ‘the’ society. As if ‘we’ as such can be circumscribed into one description. Society is the abstract term for the collection of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/the-paradigm-of-society-148.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Please Stop That Noise?</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/can-you-please-stop-that-noise-138.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/can-you-please-stop-that-noise-138.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noise. Jakarta. Richard Oh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if you were subject to the pullulation of noise all your life, would you still be annoyed, not to mention deranged, by it? Let’s push this idea a bit further, what if by noise we mean not just of the audible kind, but a whole raft of sense-assaulting ‘noises’ in a daily existence? The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/can-you-please-stop-that-noise-138.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Live</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/to-live-119.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/to-live-119.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 06:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Living. Philosophy. Richard Oh. Jakarta. Indonesia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s no such thing as ‘was’ –only is.  If  ‘was’ existed, there would be no grief or sorrow. So says William Faulkner. Years later, Alain Badiou, the French thinker, will make this statement, ‘History does not exist&#8230; There are only disparate presents whose radiance is measured by their power to unfold a past worthy of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/to-live-119.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Menuju Ke Sebuah Pemahaman Tentang Multiplisitas</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/menuju-ke-sebuah-pemahaman-tentang-multiplisitas-114.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/menuju-ke-sebuah-pemahaman-tentang-multiplisitas-114.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 06:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiplisitas. demokrasi. identitas. richard oh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Menuju ke sebuah masyarakat baru, kita perlu telisik ulang pengertian tentang pluralisme yang sering dikumandangkan oleh para pundit politik dan pemikir idealis. Kita paham terkandung dalam teriak-teriakan mereka adalah sebuah niat yang baik, yaitu sebuah masyarakat kemajemukan yang demokratis dgn toleransi tinggi terhadap perbedaan dan keadilan untuk semua. Tetapi, begitu seringnya istilah-istilah seperti demokrasi, pluralisme, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/menuju-ke-sebuah-pemahaman-tentang-multiplisitas-114.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dissemblances</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/dissemblances-99.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/dissemblances-99.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dedy Sufriadi. Dissemblances. Richard Oh. Paintings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seni, menurut Jacques Ranciere, terdiri dari imaji-imaji. Dan imaji-imaji seni adalah operasi-operasi yang memproduksikan sebuah kesenjangan (discrepancy), sebuah ketidakserupaan (dissemblance). Dalam pengertian ini, maka imaji tidak eksklusif pada apa yang terlihat (visible). ‘Ada visibilitas yang sama sekali tidak menghasilkan sebuah imaji; ada pula imaji-imaji yang keseluruhannya terdiri dari kata-kata.” Maka di permukaan sebuah karya seni [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/dissemblances-99.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sense and Sensibility</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/sense-and-sensibility-90.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/sense-and-sensibility-90.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Oh. Sense and Sensibility. Now! Jakarta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/sense-and-sensibility-90.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the longest time we’ve been misled by Descartes. We’ve been told time and again that our mind is the seat of the highest reason and emotions are a separate zone that has little to do with our critical faculties. In view of recent developments in neurosciences, we should rewire our understanding about what truly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/sense-and-sensibility-90.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Love is To Never Stop Counting</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/to-love-is-to-never-stop-counting-88.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/to-love-is-to-never-stop-counting-88.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>litchap</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To Love Is To Never Stop Counting. Philosophy of Love. Richard Oh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To talk about love is akin to bringing up an old sore to which each is to her own pain. (Ecstasy is usually consigned to the false prophets.) Much like talking about a creed, a faith, or a politic. This is so because love is strapped to the point of petrifaction with so many layers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/to-love-is-to-never-stop-counting-88.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ada Apa Dengan Cinta: sebuah sketsa prosedur kebenaran cinta Alain Badiou</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/ada-apa-dengan-cinta-sebuah-sketsa-prosedur-kebenaran-cinta-alain-badiou-86.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/ada-apa-dengan-cinta-sebuah-sketsa-prosedur-kebenaran-cinta-alain-badiou-86.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Oh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prosedur Kebenaran Cinta Alain Badiou]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/ada-apa-dengan-cinta-sebuah-sketsa-prosedur-kebenaran-cinta-alain-badiou-86.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kesetaraan dan Keabadian: Dua Pandangan Multiplisitas Yang Saling Menganyami Namun Tidak Bisa Disamakan Antara Deleuze dan Badiou</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/kesetaraan-dan-keabadian-dua-pandangan-multiplisitas-yang-saling-menganyami-namun-tidak-bisa-disamakan-antara-deleuze-dan-badiou-79.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/kesetaraan-dan-keabadian-dua-pandangan-multiplisitas-yang-saling-menganyami-namun-tidak-bisa-disamakan-antara-deleuze-dan-badiou-79.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Oh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Main Page]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kesetaraan dan Keabadian. Deleuze dan Badiou. Filsafat.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstrak: Baik Deleuze maupun Badiou memandang multiplisitas sebagai sebuah persoalan yang belum tertuntaskan sejak Parmenides. Penelusuran masing-masing filsuf mengantar filsafat mutakhir ke sebuah titik bercabang antara intensitas sebuah kehidupan nomadis dan aksioma formalis subjektif. Persoalan Satu dan Banyak (One and Many) berawal dari sebuah diskursus antara Parmenides dan Socrates yang dicatat oleh Plato dalam sebuah [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/kesetaraan-dan-keabadian-dua-pandangan-multiplisitas-yang-saling-menganyami-namun-tidak-bisa-disamakan-antara-deleuze-dan-badiou-79.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cogito itu Si Binatang Jalang oleh Robertus Robet</title>
		<link>http://richardoh.net/cogio-itu-si-binatang-jalang-oleh-robertus-robet-44.php</link>
		<comments>http://richardoh.net/cogio-itu-si-binatang-jalang-oleh-robertus-robet-44.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Oh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardoh.net/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kalau Revolusi Perancis sering dianggap sebagai ekspresi politik paling tinggi dari semangat Pencerahan, maka ekspresi dari subyektifitas Pencerahan yang paling tinggi yang pernah mampir di Indonesia bisa dikatakan ada dalam sajak-sajak Chairil Anwar. Bagaimana mungkin? Apa manfaatnya buat kita sekarang? “Aku” sebagai Deklarasi Subyek Pencerahan Bukan kebetulan bahwa pengenalan kita mengenai semangat jaman dari era [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://richardoh.net/cogio-itu-si-binatang-jalang-oleh-robertus-robet-44.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
